TFL Gallery / t-eff-adas-wk24

t-eff-adas-wk24

Discovered on disk but not present in site/config.json.

This display exists on disk but is not registered in site/config.json, so it has no reviewed metadata.

Slug
t-eff-adas-wk24
Regulatory ID
Type
Table
E3 position
unassigned
Status
built
Current iteration
v001
Datasets
Evidence
not yet generated
Requirements
Used in

Generated by the same pipeline run that wrote the ARD and the HTML above, from the same rendered cells; the short hash is the manifest's record of the file.

t-eff-adas-wk24 · post_text variant · study CDISCPILOT01 · data cut-off 2015-02-17

Primary Endpoint Analysis: ADAS-Cog (11) - Change from Baseline to Week 24 - LOCF
Study CDISCPILOT01 — Efficacy Analysis Set
Placebo (N=79) Xanomeline Low Dose (N=81) Xanomeline High Dose (N=74)
Baseline
   n 79 81 74
   Mean (SD) 24.1 (12.19) 24.4 (12.92) 21.3 (11.74)
   Median (Range) 21.0 (5;61) 21.0 (5;57) 18.0 (3;57)
Week 24
   n 79 81 74
   Mean (SD) 26.7 (13.79) 26.4 (13.18) 22.8 (12.48)
   Median (Range) 24.0 (5;62) 25.0 (6;62) 20.0 (3;62)
Change from baseline
   n 79 81 74
   Mean (SD) 2.5 (5.80) 2.0 (5.55) 1.5 (4.26)
   Median (Range) 2.0 (-11;16) 2.0 (-11;17) 1.0 (-7;13)
Statistical comparison of the change from baseline
   p-value (dose response) [1][2] 0.245
   p-value (Xanomeline - Placebo) [1][3] 0.569 0.233
      Difference of LS means (SE) -0.5 (0.82) -1.0 (0.84)
      95% CI (-2.1;1.1) (-2.7;0.7)
   p-value (Xanomeline High - Xanomeline Low) [1][3] 0.520
      Difference of LS means (SE) -0.5 (0.84)
      95% CI (-2.2;1.1)
[1] Based on an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and site group as factors and the baseline score as a covariate.
[2] Test for a non-zero coefficient for treatment (dose) as a continuous variable.
[3] Pairwise comparison with treatment as a categorical variable; p-values are not adjusted for multiple comparisons.
Missing post-baseline values are imputed by last observation carried forward, over assessments assigned to visit windows (CDISCPILOT01 statistical analysis plan, sections 8.1 and 8.2).
Treatment columns are planned treatment (TRTP), which is how the CDISCPILOT01 reference report presents them.
CDISCPILOT01 states no data cut-off date. The date shown is the latest ADAS-Cog assessment date present in the vendored ADaM package.
Source: adqsadas (ADAS-Cog (11) total score, PARAMCD ACTOT) and adsl, from the CDISC pilot's own ADaM package (phuse-org/phuse-scripts, MIT). Analysis as specified in the CDISCPILOT01 statistical analysis plan, section 10.1.1. Reference report display: Table 14-3.01. Data cut-off: 2015-02-17.
open.csr display t-eff-adas-wk24 (post_text variant); generated from the committed ARD.

Rendered from outputs/t-eff-adas-wk24/v001/table.html.

Every iteration is kept: outputs/t-eff-adas-wk24/vNNN/ holds the spec snapshot, the ARD, the rendered output, and a manifest recording who regenerated it, why, and from which commit.