The initial options report compared a thin custom OpenClaw bridge, Codex-first execution, GitHub-native coding agents, Paperclip-style orchestration, and broader agent frameworks.
| Option | Conclusion |
|---|---|
| Thin OpenClaw bridge | Useful for immediate Telegram/GitHub glue, but insufficient as a long-running agent platform. |
| Codex-first | Strong executor for PM analysis and development, but needs durable orchestration around it. |
| GitHub-native coding agents | Good for issue-to-PR coding; less complete for cross-repo PM governance. |
| Paperclip-style orchestration | Best conceptual match for agent teams, budgets, tickets, heartbeats, and approvals. |
Source report: v1 options report