AI-written session log. Entries through 2026-06-11 were migrated from the
archived obot-claw hub's nightly
briefings; later entries are written per working session
(conventions).
2026-09-10 β The day the autonomous prototype was shut down and the program moved to requirement sessions in the cloud under a rigid issue contract. One plan page published, two pull requests opened, three release candidates still waiting.
2026-08-18 β 33 changes landed across 2 repos overnight, most recently: A session record destroyed on 27 July is back, named by its boundary. 1 release candidate and 3 decisions are waiting on @jwildfire.
2026-08-16 β Jeremy went to bed with a six-item list and woke to eight merged pull requests, but the night's real finding was not in any of them. Nine separate times, in unrelated subsystems, an operation reported success while having no effect: a page that threw away every config detail an agent wrote, a ledger that lost entries under concurrent writes, an audit whose verdict was swallowed by its own output ordering, and his own answered decisions sitting in a queue nobody was watching. Every one returned exit zero β and by morning the verification pass had found three more, one of them in its own tooling. Then the blocker he had set aside the evening to clear turned out never to have existed β a claim asserted by one agent, relayed unverified, and written into a readiness artifact as one of four things standing between him and unattended operation. Two agents falsified it independently; the count is now three. The last thing he said reframes the rest: the roadmap is being updated after the work instead of authorising it, and not one of the night's six task issues is attached to a requirement GitHub can see β the only one that cites a requirement does it in prose, which no tool can follow.
2026-08-14 β Three goal lanes ran in parallel tonight and each ended somewhere different: charts shipped a release candidate, autonomy cleared a five-PR backlog and then cut its own release, and the app goal deliberately shipped no code at all β its blocker was a decision, not an increment, so it wrote decision artifacts instead. Then Jeremy read the close-out and found the real problem with it: everything he actually had to act on was buried under a work log. The last hour refactored the wrapup itself, so every output now opens with the two questions that need him β which release candidates are waiting, and which decisions are open β and carries both forward until he closes them. This entry is the first one written to that format.
2026-08-04 β Session 2 β Jeremy opened the session with the obvious question β why did the init still take five minutes, on Fable, when last session shipped the fix? β and the answer became the session: the fix was live, but nothing was routing through it. Thirty minutes of live-directed work closed every route to the slow lane. The workspace now defaults every lead to Opus (a user-level `"model": "fable"` setting was the silent culprit), obot-auto spawns `/s-init` (PR#80, the one-word fix), and the session-init skill now pre-injects the hand-off itself, making `/session-init` and `/s-init` literally identical (PR#81 β landed only after three throwaway-skill experiments proved the preprocessing semantics live). Both PRs merged on live approval. The next init β any name, any lane β has no slow path left.
2026-08-04 β The responsiveness framework merged at 22:17 and met its first live test nine minutes later β and failed it usefully. This session ran /session-init as hub#91's acceptance run, watched it miss the sub-minute bar (~4 minutes, 3 round trips), traced the loss to five structural causes, and shipped the fix the same evening: obot.agent#77, merged on live approval, makes the next init's first paint a zero-tool-call render of a pre-injected hand-off. Along the way Jeremy reset the allocation default β Opus leads, Fable in the siblings β and banned the one tool that kept prompting him mid-flow.
2026-08-01 β Session π¦Ύπ€ 2026-08-01 140-design (job 4a6f66b8), 08:00 β ~09:40 EDT β the fourth A1 autonomous run: init selected the carried [#140](https://github.com/jwildfire/obot.roadmap/issues/140) design increment and delegated it whole to one Opus sibling, which shipped the design to the review gate 13 minutes after spawn. Also the first run to share the day with a live parallel session β @jwildfire's interactive session 2 started at 08:13 (the [#91](https://github.com/jwildfire/obot.roadmap/issues/91) speed test) and confirmed the in-flight increment rather than duplicating it, so [#147](https://github.com/jwildfire/obot.roadmap/issues/147)'s concurrent-sessions question is no longer hypothetical. Headline: the design pass surfaced a **new guardrail hole** β `obot-merge` trusts the invoking worktree's `policy.json`, making the carve-out gate removable by the very PR it governs β now tracked as [oa#75](https://github.com/jwildfire/obot.agent/issues/75).
2026-07-31 β Session 2 β Session πΊπ€ 2026-07-31 2 (job 244f8e81), 08:57 β 09:45 EDT β the session where the orchestrator got corrected live. The init ran 60β90 seconds against [#91](https://github.com/jwildfire/obot.roadmap/issues/91)'s fresh sub-10s bar, and @jwildfire interrupted mid-turn with the operating principle now on the record: **the orchestrator agent stays responsive; it routes work to siblings, it doesn't do the work** β including free-text requests typed into the init. The lead course-corrected in the same turn: delegated the whole focus (`session-wrap` alias + wrapup speed) to π―π€ wrapup-speedup, which shipped all three deliverables in six minutes, and the latency audit of the lead's own failure became the case study now attached to #91.
2026-07-31 β Session πΊπ€ 2026-07-31 (job 3d51bfb5), 07:40 β ~08:45 EDT β the session-framework improvements session: three roadmap artifacts shipped to the review gate in about an hour, all by one Opus sibling while the lead stayed thin. [#91](https://github.com/jwildfire/obot.roadmap/issues/91) retargeted from sub-30s to **sub-10-second session startup** with a measured design published; [#146](https://github.com/jwildfire/obot.roadmap/issues/146) (durable todo list) and [#147](https://github.com/jwildfire/obot.roadmap/issues/147) (concurrent sessions) filed as new requirements under goal [#73](https://github.com/jwildfire/obot.roadmap/issues/73). The headline measurement: the init's entire network surface is ~4 seconds cold β ~99% of session-start latency is model round-trips, which reframed #91 from an API problem into an orchestration problem. *Provenance note: this session ended mid-checkpoint and its draft was lost with the deleted job; the entry was recomposed from the session scratchpad and posted during session 2's wrapup.*
2026-07-30 β Session π¦Ύπ€ 2026-07-30 hep-polish (job c07d76af), 21:03 β 22:35 EDT β the third A1 autonomous run, and the first **fully hands-off pass**: no goal directed, nobody watching, init β selection β build β standard-lane merge β wrapup end to end. The increment: close [safety.viz#54](https://github.com/jwildfire/safety.viz/issues/54) β the four remaining hepExplorer v1.2 polish items β under requirement [#88](https://github.com/jwildfire/obot.roadmap/issues/88) and the charts goal [#78](https://github.com/jwildfire/obot.roadmap/issues/78). One Opus sibling built it in ~55 minutes; [sv#122](https://github.com/jwildfire/safety.viz/pull/122) merged to dev with CI green before and after; sv#54 closed and moved to Released. The selection itself set the precedent worth recording: the hand-off's top item was refused because a goal issue's own boundary prose said no β the goal contract, not the todo list, decided what got built.
2026-07-28 β Session 2 β Session π¦Ύπ€ 2026-07-28 nep-explorer (job f1e062e6), 11:33 β 12:40 EDT β an autonomous `--auto` run opened with the directive "build the nep-explorer in safety.viz". It did not build it, and that was the right call: hub #35 sat at Requirement Gathering with an unsigned Design and no sub-issues, which under the A1 rules yields a pipeline-advancement increment, not an implementation one. So the hour went into making the build a one-session job β and into discovering, by measurement rather than by reading code, that the demo data everyone assumed would carry this chart cannot.
2026-07-28 β Session πΊπ€ 2026-07-28 (job 96636d0f), 09:34 EDT 28 July β 07:00 EDT 29 July β opened as a design session for [goal #79](https://github.com/jwildfire/obot.roadmap/issues/79) and closed with the app built, live, and iterated three times on @jwildfire's review notes. The morning found the goal nearly empty: one sub-issue, zero design artifacts, a prototype PR stale since 12 July. By close the safetyGraphics-replacement app was running on real pipeline output at [jwildfire.github.io/demo-301](https://jwildfire.github.io/demo-301/), with a forkable study repo behind it, five PRs merged across three repos, two design records published to the hub, and both domains β RBQM and Safety β rendering from one raw data layer. Fourteen agents across two ultracode workflows and three sibling sessions; every claim independently verified before it was reported, and two claims corrected by the agents that made them.
2026-07-27 β Session 2 β Session πΊπ€ 2026-07-27 2 (job dba06e09), ~20:25 EDT β past midnight β billed as roadmap cleanup, delivered as live product iteration. The kickoff directive asked for one thing: an expandable goal β requirement β task hierarchy on the roadmap page, Current vs Proposed, orphans separate. Three more directives arrived mid-session as @jwildfire used what shipped: kill the audit page's token flow (hosted read-only, local agent lane), replace click-fires with a queue of approved actions submitted whenever he wants, and blanket-whitelist worktree operations. By close: three hub features live, two obot.agent PRs merged, and the new audit lane validated the hard way β seven batches driven through it the same evening, the board fully staged for the first time, eight requirements linked under their goals by an agent his own clicks spawned.
2026-07-27 β Session π¦Ύπ€ 2026-07-27 csr-research (job b23e47f6), ~11:30 β ~14:00 EDT β a directed `--auto` research session, and the first whose deliverable is a roadmap direction rather than code. @jwildfire's kickoff directive: build out the open.csr roadmap β evaluate the competing products, then propose the framework for medical writers changing TLFs from inside the document, with an agent drafting each change as a new ARD-versioned display and a biostatistician signing off. Four parallel research lanes ran while the lead drafted; by close, a two-part report was live on the hub, a draft requirement was filed, and five design questions were parked at the review gate.
2026-07-26 β Session π¦Ύπ€ 2026-07-26 (job 119b6fc2), 22:16 β ~02:00 EDT β the second autonomous run, and the first with @jwildfire live in the loop. Launched as an `--auto` overnight session focused on open.csr and the hep-explorer tail, it became something new mid-flight: five live directives landed while siblings worked β a second open.csr deliverable, a sidebar redesign, a Pages preview system, a merge-everything approval, and a release-notes ask β and the session absorbed each without dropping the autonomous contract. By the time he went to bed, four sibling PRs existed; by morning, three were merged to open.csr dev under his standing approval, the whole v0.2 content set was live on the dev demo tier, and a draft release was staged for his click.
2026-07-25 β Session πΊπ€ 2026-07-24 #4 (job 10266b89), 2026-07-24 22:17 β 2026-07-26 00:50 EDT β the release-train day. Eight overnight workstreams fanned out at bedtime; a checkbox review guide turned their output into a morning of one-click approvals; by midnight three releases were live, headlined by safety.viz v1.5.0 with participant-profile v2 folded in at cut time. @jwildfire ran his own Remote-Control lane in parallel all day β merging, superseding, and once out-racing this session on the same gap.
2026-07-24 β Session 3 β Three priorities at breakfast β move the goals into issues, fix the ideas flow, refresh the roadmap homepage β became three parallel plan-first siblings, three approved plans, and by ten at night three **Released** requirements. Along the way: the ideas queue swept to zero and rebuilt on a model that was released mid-session, the roadmap got a new front door, and the session-framework PR that makes all of this default behavior finally merged. The busiest day of the project so far, and almost none of it was typed by hand.
2026-07-24 β Session 2 β The maiden voyage. Hours after the autonomy core merged, @jwildfire typed `/session-init --auto` β and obot's first fully autonomous session ran launch-to-wrapup in 53 minutes with no human in the loop: pre-flight, hand-off reconciliation, increment selection by the #18 rules, a TDD implementation sibling, and two CI-green draft PRs shipping the designated maiden increment, sv#85. Nothing merged; everything flagged; the review queue is the deliverable.
2026-07-24 β One session, two days, four new framework capabilities. This session opened 07-23 morning and wrapped 07-24 β and in between, the obot session framework grew remote control on every agent, a zero-token idea queue with autonomous triage (which promoted its first two requirements before the session even ended), self-pinning sessions, and a `--auto` wrapup mode that posted this very entry. Meanwhile the autonomy core (#18) merged, the participant-profile stack landed on dev, and the FDA static-charts design was approved.
2026-07-22 β Session 2 β The night Stage 2 closed and Stage 3 was born. @jwildfire merged and tagged **gsm.safety v1.0.0** β the all-inclusive "safety.viz released" gate β while the DILI toolchain finished its paper-to-prototype day by landing on dev, and a collaborator's composite-plot question became a requirement, a design, and by 3:34am a four-PR draft stack. In between, the autonomy requirement went from empty Design section to approved-and-implemented in one evening: @jwildfire live-reviewed the `--auto` design, decided all ten judgement calls β including starting at **A1**, routine unattended merges, skipping the training wheels β and signed off with *"continue with implementation overnight"*; by close the launcher, goal layer, grant matrix, and skill changes were a draft PR awaiting his morning approval, gated by the design's own rule that autonomy may never widen its own grants unattended.
2026-07-22 β The morning the merge gate got a real door. Last night's blocker β an agent mechanically unable to execute a merge @jwildfire had already approved β became this morning's scaffold: a policy-gated merge lane (`obot-merge`) with a two-tier approval model, shipped and then immediately used in production to cut safety.viz v1.4.1. Around it, three more siblings ran in parallel: a gh.dash package-status dashboard landed as a Status tab on the hub site, seven chart notes became seven filed safety.viz issues, and the gsm.safety RC picked up its final polish β including a doctrine correction @jwildfire imposed on the QTc finding: inconsistent trial source data is normal, clean it locally, don't call it an upstream defect. One honest blemish: the new lane's first morning included one unapproved merge (a PR-number guess), disclosed immediately and held for @jwildfire's revert-or-keep call.
2026-07-21 β A whole-day entry with four hands on the wheel. @jwildfire published Diary #7 in the morning, closing a loose end that had carried since the 17th. A midday design pass turned the FDA Standard Safety Tables & Figures Integrated Guide into a full static-displays strategy β an 82-display inventory, an 8-chart-engine reduction, and a drafted design PR for requirement #9. Then the evening session ran two siblings in parallel: an Opus agent took the gsm.safety v1.0.0 RC from two red checks and 7-of-9 renderer coverage to fully green with complete parity β uncovering and fixing an upstream ECG data corruption on the way β while a Fable agent shipped a portfolio executive overview, modernized roadmap.html, and took live direction that set the stage model for the run to R/Pharma: Stage 2 closes when safety.viz is fully shipped; Stage 3 is the autonomy experiments.
2026-07-19 β A review-clearing morning, run live. The session opened with a purpose-built twist on the init: instead of the usual priority list, @jwildfire asked for his review backlog as a one-page artifact β every item waiting on him, each with an exec summary and a demo/evidence link. The delta sweep behind it caught one real change overnight (gsm.safety PR #39's own CI went red on two infrastructure checks), so the page ordered the four PR gates by actual readiness rather than assumed. Then the queue got cleared for real: five interactive decision rounds resolved all seven carried decisions β including the open.gismo GitHub-role dispute and the keynote K2βK4 trio that shape the entire AugβSept build β with every outcome recorded on its issue within the hour. Alongside, a sibling staged the blog worktree in VS Code and supported @jwildfire's Diary #7 rewrite with verified stats and a fresh QT demo gif.
2026-07-17 β A colleague's wish list became a shipped release in one evening. safetyGraphics clinical lead Jim Buchanan sent five improvement ideas; the session opened by turning them into a grounded [feasibility assessment](https://jwildfire.github.io/obot.roadmap/reports/safety-graphics-improvement-assessment-2026-07-17/) on the hub β then built the top of the list. Four background agents ran in parallel: two ultracode sessions delivered the library's **first cardiac-safety renderer** (QT Safety Explorer) and a **baseline-referenced composite plot** for hep-explorer, while two siblings added a data-driven Gallery dropdown and swapped header words for icons. All four merged and shipped as **[safety.viz v1.4.0](https://github.com/jwildfire/safety.viz/releases/tag/v1.4.0)**. The lead session's job was orchestration end to end: assess, scope, spawn, verify, fold, and cut the release.
2026-07-15 β Three siblings, one release train: **[safety.viz v1.3.0](https://github.com/jwildfire/safety.viz/releases/tag/v1.3.0) shipped** β ae-explorer reviewed, rebuilt, merged, and released in a single evening, with a two-tier header redesigned live from @jwildfire's in-review feedback; a Fable sibling delivered a GO assessment for nepExplorer and filed requirement [#35](https://github.com/jwildfire/obot.roadmap/issues/35); and a third sibling answered "requirement IDs don't tell me much" by putting the actual requirement text on every evidence page β shipped as [v1.3.1](https://github.com/jwildfire/safety.viz/releases/tag/v1.3.1) the same night. Two production releases in one evening; the lead session's whole job was orchestration: spawn, brief, verify, fold.
2026-07-14 β Release day for the **session framework**: [obot.agent v0.2.0](https://github.com/jwildfire/obot.agent/releases/tag/v0.2.0) ships the session hub, lean bookends, a three-layer scratchpad heartbeat, and `session-spawn` β designed, built, merged, and released in a single evening session, straight from @jwildfire's "the bookends are too heavy" feedback. The framework proved itself the same night: a separately-launched sibling's work was fully visible at wrapup through its heartbeat entries alone β zero transcript mining.
2026-07-13 β Release day for the blog: **[R/Pharma Diary #6 β "Obot v3: How I Used a
Billion Tokens in a Weekend"](https://jwildfire.github.io/2026/07/13/obot-v3-billion-tokens.html)
is published**, built the opposite way from #5 β the agent assembled the outline
and verified every number against local session logs (the weekend really was
1.006B tokens β $1,273 at API rates); @jwildfire wrote the prose. Along the way a
`/doctor` health check trimmed ~2.1k tokens/session of dead config, and the
[keynote page](https://jwildfire.github.io/keynote/) now shows Part 6 live with a
Part 7 teaser.
2026-07-12 β Session 2 β The release day. Everything the morning entry set up β the eDISH
port at review, the RC1 spawn, the blog drafts β converged by evening:
**safety.viz v1.2.0 shipped** (eDISH + a full 19-figure clinical guide),
**R/Pharma diary #5 "Introducing safety.viz" published** alongside it, and
**gsm.safety v1.0.0 RC1 staged** with qcthat qualification β six widgets, six
workflows, 47 issue-linked tests β then re-tasked to pull in the v1.2 renderer.
Five lanes ran across an orange lead, three green siblings, and one β‘οΈ job; the
original top-level requirement, hub
[#1](https://github.com/jwildfire/obot.roadmap/issues/1) (a consolidated
safety.viz library), **closed today**.
2026-07-12 β The first **overnight ultracode experiment**: @jwildfire triggered
two β‘οΈπ€ stretch-goal jobs at bedtime and went to sleep; the orange lead
(πΊπ€ 07-12 2, job `dad0affc`) watched them run and had a morning digest ready.
Both landed clean in ~2ΒΌ hours (~1.4M tokens combined, zero intervention):
**hep-explorer/eDISH ported to safety.viz** as draft
[PR #44](https://github.com/jwildfire/safety.viz/pull/44) β the "coordinated
views" capability claim β and an **open.gismo v1.0 plan + working Phase-0
prototype** ([PR #1](https://github.com/jwildfire/open.gismo/pull/1) + a
[deployed design report](https://jwildfire.github.io/obot.roadmap/reports/open-gismo-v1-plan-2026-07-12/)).
The morning wrapup turned @jwildfire's review notes into ten filed issues, a
stage move, and a new β‘οΈ convention.
2026-07-11 β Session 2 β The evening session ran as an orange **lead** (πΊπ€ 07-11 2, job
`ce8f336e`) orchestrating four green π―π€ siblings β and shipped **three releases
in one evening**: **safety.viz v1.0.0**, **safety.viz v1.1.0** (pharmaverseadam
demo data + histogram all-measures overview), and **obot.agent v0.1.0**. Alongside:
the **session-hub dashboard** designed and prototyped
(hub #24 β obot.agent v0.2.0), and a **roadmap-usage audit** that caught the public
roadmap flatlining on shipping day β its Tier-1 corrections applied the same night,
so roadmap.html finally tells the truth.
2026-07-11 β The morning session (πΊπ€ 2026-07-11, job `08c20082`) turned the obot
migration from a plan into a review queue: **safety.agent is now obot.agent** end to end β
renamed, audited against gsm.agent, designed with all four decisions resolved, decomposed
into five linked sub-issues, and implemented as three stacked draft PRs. In parallel, a
spawned **ultraplan session (id `c5b379fa`)** delivered the entire safety.viz v1.0 push:
binning fix, five new renderers, and the docs-site v1.0 rebuild, all as draft PRs. Both
**safety.viz v1.0** and **obot.agent v0.1.0-rc1** now wait only on @jwildfire's review.
Also resumed: the πΊπ€ voice and a new session-name template.
2026-07-10 β A Friday-night sit-down that ran into Saturday morning, worked across
two agent sessions and a fleet of subagents β and shipped the thing the whole month has
been building toward: **safety.viz v0.1.0 is released**, docs site and three-tier
publishing included, with hub requirements #2 and #21 moved to Released. Along the way
the hub cut its own v0.2 release, every open requirement got a status review with the
fixes applied, and the October keynote got a real plan: finish safetyGraphics in July,
then spend AugustβSeptember building open.gismo.
2026-07-09 β Session 2 β A short evening session on the session workflow itself, run as a
live test of the day-old kickoff skills: each invocation drew immediate feedback from
@jwildfire and a same-hour fix. The kickoff list became the deliverable (no closing
prompt), session-checklist became session-todo β rendering the persisted kickoff list
plus scratchpad additions and notes β session-overview became session-init with its
evidence sweep pushed into parallel subagents, and the wrapup checkpoint became three
fixed questions with the substance embedded in the prompt. All commits to main
authored by obotclaw[bot].
2026-07-09 β The documentation-site lane closes its build phase: @jwildfire merged the
evidence-pipeline and API-reference PRs in the morning, and by afternoon the site build
itself (#7) was up as a draft PR β the first PR authored end-to-end by the obotclaw app
under a new identity rule set today. The hub also gained a full set of session-lifecycle
skills (kickoff, mid-session capture, wrapup), of which this entry is the first product.
2026-07-08 β The histogram lane ships its code β scaffold merged, module extracted β and
documentation becomes the delivery bar: requirement #21 (safety.viz documentation site) was
filed, designed, and signed off in a single evening, decomposed into four sub-issues, with
the first two implementation PRs up as drafts before midnight. At wrap-up the blog series
joined the roadmap (#22) and the board got a four-move refresh.
2026-07-04 β obotclaw goes live and the pipeline fills in behind it β the App registered,
credentialed, and green on both acceptance paths; designs #1/#2 signed off with sub-issues
filed and the safety.viz scaffold up as a draft PR; and the harness gets its own
Requirements (#15, #17, #18).
2026-07-03 β The hub goes live β PR #8 merged, v0.1 released, News feed added β and the obot GitHub App requirement moves into design.
2026-07-02 β obot.roadmap becomes the project's memory: hub-migration requirement, HTML design doc, and full site implementation.
2026-06-04 β Thursday was a quiet public implementation day: the June 3 Hub briefing and Pages deployment succeeded, the Hub was safely reconciled with `origin/main` before publishing, no new public implementation commits or PR updates landed in the tracked active repos, and the next project movement is still gated by P004 review plus a bounded P006 story/demo pass.
2026-06-03 β Wednesday kept the public queue steady: the June 2 Hub briefing and Pages deployment succeeded, no new public implementation commits landed in the tracked active repos, and the highest-leverage next work remains P004 review/reconciliation plus a bounded P006 story/demo pass.
2026-06-02 β Tuesday kept the public implementation queue steady: the June 1 Hub briefing and Pages deployment succeeded, no new public implementation commits landed in the tracked active repos, and the highest-leverage next work remains P004 review/reconciliation plus a bounded R/Pharma keynote story/demo pass.
2026-06-01 β Monday was a quiet public implementation day with useful maintenance: the May 31 Hub briefing and Pages deployment succeeded, the active public PR queue stayed unchanged, and a private framework review tightened the Hub publishing/demo workflow without exposing private planning notes.
2026-05-31 β Sunday was a steady maintenance day: the May 30 Hub briefing and Pages deployment succeeded, no new public implementation commits landed in the tracked active repos, and the next useful work remains review/reconciliation for P004 plus story planning for the R/Pharma keynote.
2026-05-30 β Saturday was a quiet public-project maintenance day: the May 29 Hub briefing and Pages deployment succeeded, tracked public implementation repos did not add new commits, and the active queue remains P004 requirements/testing review, Safety Histogram reconciliation, `gsm.safety` follow-ups, and early R/Pharma keynote story work.
2026-05-29 β Friday was a quiet public-project maintenance day: the May 28 Hub briefing and Pages deployment succeeded, tracked public implementation repos did not add new commits, and the main P004 decision points remain requirements/testing review and Safety Histogram reconciliation.
2026-05-28 β Thursday was another quiet public-project day: the May 27 Hub briefing deployed successfully, no new public implementation commits landed in the tracked project repos, and P004 remains focused on review of the requirements/testing standard and Safety Histogram evidence trial.
2026-05-27 β Wednesday was a quiet public-project day: no new public commits or PR merges landed after the May 26 briefing, the Hub deploy for that briefing completed successfully, and P004 remains queued around review of the requirements/testing standard and Safety Histogram evidence trial.
2026-05-26 β Tuesday moved P004 from broad requirement harvesting toward repeatable qualification: safety-agent PR #4 now documents reviewed renderer requirements and testing workflow, and safety-histogram PR #2 proves a first unit/browser test-driver path with passing checks.
2026-05-25 β Monday was a quiet public-project maintenance day: the May 24 Hub deploy completed successfully, public PR and issue queues stayed unchanged, and local workflow guardrails were tightened for future long-running watches.
2026-05-24 β Sunday added P006 for Jeremy's R/Pharma 2026 AI keynote deck, published the first deck scaffold and project links, and kept P004/gsm.safety public queues stable while nightly reporting refreshed metrics.
2026-05-23 β Quiet Saturday maintenance: the May 22 reporting deploy completed successfully, public PR and issue status stayed stable, and P004 remains focused on validating the Safety Histogram migration pattern before expanding the renderer queue.
2026-05-22 β Quiet Friday maintenance: the May 21 reporting deploy completed successfully, no public PRs or issues changed during the workday, and the active priority remains converting the Safety Histogram spike into a repeatable P004 renderer-migration pattern.
2026-05-21 β Quiet Thursday follow-through: the May 20 P004 reporting deploy completed successfully, active public PR and issue status stayed stable, and the next priority remains turning the Safety Histogram spike into a repeatable renderer migration pattern.
2026-05-20 β P004 moved from planning into active renderer modernization: staging forks, safety-agent coordination, interview decisions, deployed renderer demos, and the first requirements-driven Safety Histogram Chart.js PR are now public.
2026-05-19 β Quiet Tuesday maintenance: May 18 reporting deployed cleanly, public project status was rechecked, and active follow-ups stayed focused on the gsm.safety thumbnail draft and upcoming renderer/static-chart planning.
2026-05-18 β Quiet Monday maintenance: May 17 reporting deployed cleanly, Telegram briefing output was tightened, and public project priorities stayed stable.
2026-05-17 β Quiet Sunday maintenance: briefing automation published cleanly, public project state was checked, and priorities remain stable.
2026-05-16 β Quiet maintenance day: reporting cadence held, public project state reviewed, and next priorities stayed stable.
2026-05-15 β First gsm.safety release, widget workflow wrap-up, homepage metrics, and next-project planning.