26bd8dachangelog v2.16.1 is 6 commits behind this build — last written 8d ago, so 6 changes to what the site shows are unrecorded
A design with no interface: two commands write the mapping, the error message is the whole surface, and the mapping lives in git as a reviewable diff. Measured on a CRO delivery where the matcher's most confident guess silently empties eight metrics.
What gsm.mapping already solves for loading your own study data and what is genuinely missing, established by running the packages: the readiness check never reads the source_col key that fixes the problem it reports, so it can never go green.
A six-question setup interview for loading your own study into open.gismo, argued from four runs: what the name detector misses, what value profiling recovers, where it is confidently wrong, and how a half-mapped study doubles a site's risk score.
A design direction for loading your own study into open.gismo: never reject a folder, profile everything in it, and answer in one costed document — priced in the charts each gap turns off. Measured against a six-file CRO delivery.
A design direction for loading your own study into open.gismo: one dense screen showing all 126 required columns beside your delivered ones, four dispositions per row, and the price of every decision printed while you make it.
Which of four data-loading designs open.gismo should build, and why: read the folder first, price every gap in charts rather than columns, keep a worksheet behind the report for the fortieth transfer, and refuse to run while the identifiers do not join.
Getting a real study in means satisfying 126 columns by hand-editing YAML, and nothing checks that the subject identifiers join — a design for the surface that fixes both, with clickable mockups and how thirteen other platforms let a user in.
Recording that a person looked at a finding, and telling them what changed since. The published snapshot names turn out not to be stable — one has meant four different datasets — so a review is keyed to the data itself. Six questions.
A study produces about a dozen documents and open.csr could build one. The second shipped tonight: an ICH E3 synopsis built from the same numbers as the report — plus which of the rest the R Consortium pilots could seed, and why their licences say almost none.
The running list of calls waiting on you. Each page states the situation, the options with what each one costs, and a plain recommendation — these and release-candidate pull requests are the only two things you review.
A walkthrough of how open.csr turns a study dataset into a clinical study report: the four kinds of file you edit, how a table's numbers get bound into sentences instead of retyped, and the places the shipped code and the written contracts disagree.
Nine years of feature requests left in twelve retired safetyGraphics chart trackers, sorted into what the new library should build, what it already does, and what died with the old framework — plus nine cheap wins that clear thirty-three of them.
Two of the thirteen safety charts have no R binding, and the reason on file is wrong about both. One is already on screen inside eight widgets that ship today; the other builds without complaint and then draws an error. Four questions, every option run.
The liver chart in R was reading two participants' own baseline as their on-treatment peak; this release stops it. Both chart bundles run side by side on the same data, with the records that caused it and the two new charts the release adds.
The safety overview said four deaths on a study with thirteen; this release rebuilds every figure on that page as a metric that publishes its own numerator, denominator and provenance. The before and after run side by side on the same study.
The thirteenth census number is the one that could not be built: no standard domain says which visit a lab result belongs to. Five questions, every option measured on two real studies, and a recommendation that needs nothing from anyone else's package.
The ten requirements ranked next and the eleven waiting behind them, each with the one line saying why it sits there — and a player that replays every re-rank of the single day the order has existed.
The framework builds clinical charts well and nobody has written what version 1.0 contains — the evidence for both, ten items to replace the scaffold head of the queue, the charts worth making, and the smallest weekend build that would test it.
A proposed dashboard tab that reads a whole day of agent merges as one summary — what landed in the harness versus what will ship to users, which agent landed it, and which branch it flows to — with 2026-08-20's real numbers rendered inside it.
Eleven of the thirteen branches the merge policy governs have no protection at all, including the one holding the merge policy. Three options for what to lock down, what each costs the agents, and why the recommended one does not slow a single merge.
Both packages have been off CRAN since March. The fix is prepared, checked and audited, and the tarballs sit on one laptop. Submitting them is outside every lane we have and is yours to take — here is what it costs and the order that cannot be reversed.
You move to a new laptop this weekend. Eleven questions come first, starting with whether the old machine is copied across or rebuilt clean — plus two things already true: nothing here is backed up, and one key cannot be recovered.
Decided 2026-08-20: he approved all six recommendations. The safety census is rebuilt so its numbers can be validated one at a time — the shape, what each answer commits the build to, every defect the review found, and what moves on the live demo.
33 changes landed across 2 repos overnight, most recently: A session record destroyed on 27 July is back, named by its boundary. 1 release candidate and 3 decisions are waiting on @jwildfire.
Who does what in the agent framework: one human, three named roles, a crew of numbered workers, and the script that watches them all — with the failure that created each role, dated 17 August 2026, and the two seams still open.
Seventy-four roadmap requirements end with a line asserting that @jwildfire reviewed them, and nothing anywhere records that he did. Fifty are still open and thirty-eight sit one stage from development. Counted and named here rather than rewritten.
All four questions answered. He approved the rewritten done-condition and the five workstreams on 18 August, dictated from his phone after listening to the audio episode — the first decision this program has taken through a brief rather than a page.
Decided 2026-08-18, against the recommendation: SafetyCensus() stays, and is rebuilt on the gsm metric framework as metrics plus a report. The panel's verified defects all stand — he is answering a different question, about what the census is for.
**See it move:** the [annotated v1.1 demo](https://jwildfire.github.io/obot.roadmap/reports/gs-v1.1-demo/) walks the new metrics running live on the [DEMO-301 study…
Jeremy went to bed with a six-item list and woke to eight merged pull requests, but the night's real finding was not in any of them. Nine separate times, in unrelated subsystems, an operation…
One page for the Navigator: what the session is, how it launches, what it reads and writes, what it does on day one, and what it must never do. Folds in the worker-closeout and supervision pages, and six calls you still have to make.
Three working redesigns of the roadmap page, built on live data and decided the same day: the queue becomes the front page, the wire sits one click behind it, and the current inventory page stays on as the catalog.
Not yet — and here is the finish line. Five gates between today and unattended overnight sessions, what each one costs, and the check you can run yourself to tell whether it has been met.
What gsm.safety v1.1.0 adds, annotated: the participant-level metrics phase and SafetyCensus, captured running live on the DEMO-301 study site.
Which safety.viz charts have an R wrapper and which do not: four have none, and all nine that exist draw through a bundle two releases behind — including the liver-injury chart, which still renders a calculation corrected months ago.
What open.gismo v0.2.0 delivers, annotated: the local-first engine and the study site, captured live from the DEMO-301 deployment.
What v1.7.0 adds, annotated: the Time-to-Event Explorer, captured live from the release-candidate build, with a way into each behaviour.
You asked to be interviewed about what the app should be. This is the research on how to actually extract intent someone holds but cannot state, and the four calls in the interview method that shipped as a skill.
A formal list for the recurring category no lane holds — fully-specified fixes whose only missing ingredient is @jwildfire's keyboard. Four calls: the scope test, where it lives (security first), how agents write it, and how it reaches him. BL1–BL4.
Where your decisions get written down now that the discussion board is not the place: whether an approve button on the published page is worth building, whether one chronological log should exist, and whether the roadmap needs another tracker.
Recorded: @jwildfire kept both delegation lanes — siblings for deliverables, subagents for answers — because subagent results flow through prime's own context. His words, the rationale, and the one-line routing rule now written into the skills.
The operational-vs-clinical governing principle keys on a per-repo classification @jwildfire never enumerated. The clear cases recorded, the three ambiguous repos put to him as numbered options, and the CI precondition stated plainly.
A standing prime has no session start and no session end, so the bookend-built scaffold needs a verdict per piece, a new trigger for the wrapup's duties, and a morning briefing designed from why the last one failed. Five calls, M1–M5.
The nightly roadmap audit judged by your own test — if a finding needs your attention it probably is not a good rule. Five of twenty-two rules fail it, and two rules produced eighteen of the twenty-four findings that landed in your lap.
Published as "go, after four fixes" — corrected to three. The permission denial that justified the fourth was re-checked and did not exist, and the work it was blocking has merged. What still breaks at 3am, and the pre-flight checklist before enabling.
Forty-one agents finished in two days and three left no recoverable trace of what they did. What a worker must produce before it may call itself done, how the Navigator would check it at closeout, and why telling the agents apart is harder than it looks.
You asked whether the worker agents need a manager. Measured from 36 hours of real sessions: what a watcher can actually see, what the same job costs as a script versus a standing session, and whether it gates next week's scheduled runs.
Kaplan–Meier survival curves for safety.viz: the statistics stated exactly, the data contract, the at-risk and cumulative-events table, and how the module gets verified against a reference implementation.
**See it move:** the [annotated v1.7.0 demo](https://jwildfire.github.io/obot.roadmap/reports/sv-v1.7-demo/) walks the new chart with captures and try-it-yourself steps against the live demo.
**See it move:** the [annotated v0.4.0 demo](https://jwildfire.github.io/obot.roadmap/reports/oa-v0.4-demo/) walks each change as a real terminal capture with the command that produced it.
Three goal lanes ran in parallel tonight and each ended somewhere different: charts shipped a release candidate, autonomy cleared a five-PR backlog and then cut its own release, and the app goal…
What v0.4.0 changes about running a session, shown as before/after terminal captures with the exact command to reproduce each one.
What v1.6.0 adds, feature by feature: annotated captures from the release-candidate build, with a way into each one.
The app goal has blocked itself for a month on a plan that the design pass and the demo build overtook. Four calls: what replaces the stale plan, what the requirement set is, what version one means, and whether the demo study is the fork template.
The demo study's published branch is 302 MB, but that is not what a fork downloads. What was actually measured, six options with what each costs, and two cheap changes plus a bound on future growth.
An agent can still quietly change the rules that govern agents, and twice one has. One real decision on what the merge tool must demand when a change touches a guardrail file, plus two sign-offs — the fix itself is already written.
The merge lane was not broken. One invocation form falls outside the permission allowlist and is denied by the auto-mode classifier roughly two times in three. Evidence from 99 invocations, and the one-line fix.
obot.agent's integration branch is main, so there is no branch left to open a release PR from. Four ways to give it an RC that is an actual PR, with what each costs and how v0.4.0 ships under it.
The standing concierge session will eventually lose its memory, and nothing currently makes its “durable state lives elsewhere” claim true. Six calls on what it writes down, who keeps that honest, and what it reads to get back to useful.
**See it move:** the [annotated v1.6.0 demo](https://jwildfire.github.io/obot.roadmap/reports/sv-v1.6-demo/) walks each update with captures and try-it-yourself steps against the live gallery.
Jeremy opened the session with the obvious question — why did the init still take five minutes, on Fable, when last session shipped the fix? — and the answer became the session: the fix was live, but…
The responsiveness framework merged at 22:17 and met its first live test nine minutes later — and failed it usefully. This session ran /session-init as hub#91's acceptance run, watched it miss the…
📊 Session report: skipped — the generator keys on today's date and this wrapup ran 08-04; the missing `--date` flag is [oa#32](https://github.com/jwildfire/obot.agent/issues/32).
Session 🦾🤖 2026-08-01 140-design (job 4a6f66b8), 08:00 → ~09:40 EDT — the fourth A1 autonomous run: init selected the carried [#140](https://github.com/jwildfire/obot.roadmap/issues/140) design…
Making the per-repo write policy mechanical: checking a change's files against the guardrail carve-out, settling whose copy of the policy the tool reads, and making the dry-run check stop implying a merge will succeed.
Session 😺🤖 2026-07-31 2 (job 244f8e81), 08:57 → 09:45 EDT — the session where the orchestrator got corrected live. The init ran 60–90 seconds against…
Session 😺🤖 2026-07-31 (job 3d51bfb5), 07:40 → ~08:45 EDT — the session-framework improvements session: three roadmap artifacts shipped to the review gate in about an hour, all by one Opus sibling…
Session startup takes ten minutes and the network accounts for four seconds of it. Where the time actually goes, and a three-tier design that paints a usable list first and reconciles behind it.
Session 🦾🤖 2026-07-30 hep-polish (job c07d76af), 21:03 → 22:35 EDT — the third A1 autonomous run, and the first **fully hands-off pass**: no goal directed, nobody watching, init → selection → build…
Every claimed defect in gsm.qtl's QTL report module, re-run from a clean R session against the package's own bundled inputs: four confirmed with captured repros, one withdrawn, and the coverage gap underneath all of them.
Session 🦾🤖 2026-07-28 nep-explorer (job f1e062e6), 11:33 → 12:40 EDT — an autonomous `--auto` run opened with the directive "build the nep-explorer in safety.viz". It did not build it, and that was…
Session 😺🤖 2026-07-28 (job 96636d0f), 09:34 EDT 28 July → 07:00 EDT 29 July — opened as a design session for [goal #79](https://github.com/jwildfire/obot.roadmap/issues/79) and closed with the app…
Mockups for the app's top-level pages, built around what changed since the snapshot you last reviewed: a change ledger, the riskiest-sites table beside a funnel plot, and three conventions to settle once. Every number is real demo-study data.
The design record behind the safetyGraphics replacement — three ways to frame the app's navigation with a recommendation, and the framework underneath: pipelines, config in a forkable study repo, and snapshots as the only data interface.
The kidney-safety explorer as a chart module: the KDIGO staging logic re-derived from the original app, the measurement-units contract that decides whether the numbers are right, and what the patient-profile phase adds.
Session 😺🤖 2026-07-27 2 (job dba06e09), ~20:25 EDT → past midnight — billed as roadmap cleanup, delivered as live product iteration. The kickoff directive asked for one thing: an expandable goal →…
Session 🦾🤖 2026-07-27 csr-research (job b23e47f6), ~11:30 → ~14:00 EDT — a directed `--auto` research session, and the first whose deliverable is a roadmap direction rather than code. @jwildfire's…
Two-part research on the clinical study report side quest: eighteen products examined and none tracks a display change request as an object, plus a framework that makes the request a versioned artifact reviewed against a computed data diff.
What v0.2.0 adds, feature by feature: annotated captures taken from the live site, with a way into each one.
The second release for `open.csr` adds several foundational features, including the ability to edit text in the app, an initial rtf implementation for tables, a "values" section and various UX…
Session 🦾🤖 2026-07-26 (job 119b6fc2), 22:16 → ~02:00 EDT — the second autonomous run, and the first with @jwildfire live in the loop. Launched as an `--auto` overnight session focused on open.csr…
A clickable twelve-step protocol for the open.csr text-block editor, running the repository’s own gate and diff code against a real ARD: every step states what it expects and then checks itself.
Two renderers join the gallery and one of them is not a chart. The hepatic tooling grows a third view and a companion module for trials that enrol participants who already have abnormal liver tests,…
obot.agent can now run a full development increment without a human in the loop — and the roadmap now feeds it.
The first release of **open.csr** — an open-source Clinical Study Report builder. This is an early prototype, and it is labelled as one: it demonstrates a closed loop end to end on real public data,…
Session 😺🤖 2026-07-24 #4 (job 10266b89), 2026-07-24 22:17 → 2026-07-26 00:50 EDT — the release-train day. Eight overnight workstreams fanned out at bedtime; a checkbox review guide turned their…
Three working prototypes that turn the nightly roadmap audit into a queue you can clear in one sitting, measured against the live page: 9.3 screens down to 2.0. Option B was picked the same day.
Evidence for typing a prompt into the live session dashboard and reaching a running agent session — both delivery lanes built and verified end to end, the security argument, and why it was parked rather than shipped.
Thirteen commercial and open-source safety platforms scored against this portfolio on sixty-three capabilities. The charts are competitive and ahead in two places; nine of ten review-workflow capabilities do not exist here at all.
What v1.5.0 adds, feature by feature: annotated captures taken from the live dev site, with a way into each one.
The release face of safety.viz v1.5.0 — the participant profile, the migration Sankey and ALT waterfall, and the liver-chart follow-ups — in the order to review them, ending in the two actions that promote the release.
The roadmap now largely runs itself: it triages its own ideas, audits its own consistency, and shows what everything costs.
Three priorities at breakfast — move the goals into issues, fix the ideas flow, refresh the roadmap homepage — became three parallel plan-first siblings, three approved plans, and by ten at night…
The maiden voyage. Hours after the autonomy core merged, @jwildfire typed `/session-init --auto` — and obot's first fully autonomous session ran launch-to-wrapup in 53 minutes with no human in the…
One session, two days, four new framework capabilities. This session opened 07-23 morning and wrapped 07-24 — and in between, the obot session framework grew remote control on every agent, a…
Every open issue in the portfolio plotted against the standing goals — and the sixty-one percent that roll up to nothing, which an agent picking its own work cannot see at all. Three new goals proposed, with rosters.
A read-only dry run of the automatic idea-triage lane under two models, with each one's classification of the same seven threads side by side and the cost per run — the calibration behind the model switch.
Interactive UX mockup for participant profile v2: the profile in a right-hand rail, the four surfacing options side by side, expand-to-full-screen, and the AE summary + AE timeline tracks on the lab chart's study-day axis.
Capturing an idea in seconds from a phone and having it triaged without you: the voice-to-reminders lane, the discussion queue it feeds, the automatic pass that classifies and replies, and what stays private.
Standing goals move from files into hub issues so direction can be edited without a pull request, with one page per goal on the site and a thin registry binding goals to how an agent selects work.
The second version of the participant profile: moving it from a dock under the chart to a right-hand rail that opens on click, and adding adverse events to what a person's page shows.
There is no supported way to talk to a running agent session. Four delivery lanes measured against each other, and the recommended one — a file-based inbox with the session transcript tailed as the reply stream.
First stable release: gsm.safety is now the R home of the safety.viz interactive chart library, mirroring the gsm.kri / gsm.viz architecture.
The night Stage 2 closed and Stage 3 was born. @jwildfire merged and tagged **gsm.safety v1.0.0** — the all-inclusive "safety.viz released" gate — while the DILI toolchain finished its…
The morning the merge gate got a real door. Last night's blocker — an agent mechanically unable to execute a merge @jwildfire had already approved — became this morning's scaffold: a policy-gated…
A collaborator asked why clicking a point does not open that person's whole story the way the original eDISH did. Four ways to surface one shared participant profile from every chart, with a recommendation.
How an agent session picks its own work and ships it unattended — goals to increments to sessions, the per-repo permission matrix, three autonomy levels, and the kill switches that stop a run.
Two displays from the abnormal-baseline liver-injury paper — a migration Sankey and a modified ALT waterfall — and how the existing liver chart splits to make room for them without breaking it.
The Gallery's QT example data is now internally consistent: QTcF and QTcB are derived directly from QT and RR in the vendored `adeg` demo dataset, replacing the pilot data's implausible rederived…
A whole-day entry with four hands on the wheel. @jwildfire published Diary #7 in the morning, closing a loose end that had carried since the 17th. A midday design pass turned the FDA Standard Safety…
Where every workstream stood after seven weeks, what shipped, what was stuck at a gate, and the gaps between the public roadmap page and reality — the status read that set the stage model and the autumn arc.
The FDA's standard safety tables and figures guide, inventoried display by display: open-source R has largely solved the tables and barely touched the figures, and the untouched figures are almost exactly the chart set we already own.
Qualification evidence for the first gsm.safety release: nine R chart widgets rendering live on demo data, eighty-two issue-linked tests, and the matrix tying every test to the requirement it proves.
Build the FDA safety figures the open-source ecosystem is missing, borrow the table logic that already exists, and share the guide's normative rules between the static and interactive charts rather than duplicating them.
A review-clearing morning, run live. The session opened with a purpose-built twist on the init: instead of the usual priority list, @jwildfire asked for his review backlog as a one-page artifact —…
The library's first cardiac-safety renderer joins the gallery, hep-explorer gains a baseline-referenced view for subjects with abnormal baseline liver tests, and the Gallery is one click from any…
I demoed safety.viz for safetyGraphics’ clinical lead, Jim Buchanan, this week and asked if he had any improvements in mind, and no surprise, he had a few! Jim promptly sent a handful of references,…
A colleague's wish list became a shipped release in one evening. safetyGraphics clinical lead Jim Buchanan sent five improvement ideas; the session opened by turning them into a grounded [feasibility…
Five improvement ideas from colleagues scoped into buildable requirements — the hepatic composite plot, the QT explorer, renal safety, benefit-risk and recurrent adverse events — each with feasibility and where the risk sits.
Each renderer's **Test evidence** page now shows the reviewed requirement **text** next to its ID, so you can see exactly what every test verifies without leaving the page. Previously the Requirement…
The first table-first renderer joins the library — an interactive Adverse Event Explorer.
Three siblings, one release train: **[safety.viz v1.3.0](https://github.com/jwildfire/safety.viz/releases/tag/v1.3.0) shipped** — ae-explorer reviewed, rebuilt, merged, and released in a single…
Can the kidney-safety explorer become a Chart.js module? Yes — it is the kidney twin of the liver chart and reuses its proven pattern. The clinical logic, which source to migrate from, and the data gap that is the real constraint.
This release turns day-to-day session management into a first-class framework: a live dashboard with frozen per-session reports, lean session bookends built on a shared scratchpad, an enforced…
Release day for the **session framework**: [obot.agent v0.2.0](https://github.com/jwildfire/obot.agent/releases/tag/v0.2.0) ships the session hub, lean bookends, a three-layer scratchpad heartbeat,…
😺🤖 7/10 Friday night — safety.viz v0.1.0 released end to end: docs site, three-tier Pages publishing, staging-review fixes (12M/$20) — diary
Release day for the blog: **[R/Pharma Diary #6 — "Obot v3: How I Used a Billion Tokens in a Weekend"](https://jwildfire.github.io/2026/07/13/obot-v3-billion-tokens.html) is published**, built the…
The eDISH liver-safety explorer joins the library — with a clinical guide that teaches how to read it.
The release day. Everything the morning entry set up — the eDISH port at review, the RC1 spawn, the blog drafts — converged by evening: **safety.viz v1.2.0 shipped** (eDISH + a full 19-figure…
My last post laid out the plan for {safetyGraphics} v2 and ended on the obvious question: can we actually do this? Here’s the first big answer: safety.viz is live.1 AI collaboration note — this post…
The first **overnight ultracode experiment**: @jwildfire triggered two ⚡️🤖 stretch-goal jobs at bedtime and went to sleep; the orange lead (😺🤖 07-12 2, job `dad0affc`) watched them run and had a…
Full drafts of three R/Pharma diary posts for review before publishing — introducing safety.viz, the move to Claude Code, and the overnight-run case study — with the running order and how each one gets published.
Every open issue on the original liver-safety renderer triaged against our rewrite, with ten worth landing this release — plus a clinical guide tab that teaches the eDISH evaluation workflow.
The architecture decision and phased plan for turning open.gismo into a replacement for the safetyGraphics app: local-first compute with GitHub demoted to optional publisher, scored by a four-judge panel, with a working prototype.
The histogram gets a whole-dataset view, and the example data now comes from a scripted pharmaverse pipeline.
**safety.viz is a charting library for monitoring clinical trial safety.** Point any of its six interactive charts at your study data and review it in the browser: filter, group, zoom, and click…
First release of obot.agent — the obot program overlay on the [gsm.agent](https://github.com/Gilead-BioStats/gsm.agent) harness, rebuilt from safety.agent per the signed-off requirement…
The evening session ran as an orange **lead** (😺🤖 07-11 2, job `ce8f336e`) orchestrating four green 👯🤖 siblings — and shipped **three releases in one evening**: **safety.viz v1.0.0**,…
The morning session (😺🤖 2026-07-11, job `08c20082`) turned the obot migration from a plan into a review queue: **safety.agent is now obot.agent** end to end — renamed, audited against gsm.agent,…
What the agent-harness repo became in a single day — the rename, the three-layer overlay that stopped skills living in two places, and the readiness scorecard against the requirement's success criteria.
The night two releases shipped and four agents were building, the public roadmap page showed nothing in development. How the page decides what is in flight, what actually happened, and the corrections proposed.
Five live mockups of the safety.viz front page, each in the real theme with real charts, taking a different position on what the first screen claims the site is for. Recommendation included.
Rebuilding the project's agent harness as a thin overlay on the shared upstream one: what was duplicated, where each skill should live so none lives in two places, and what goes back upstream.
A live dashboard for what a working session is doing, and a frozen report when it closes — where the data already lives, what each panel shows, and how the diary entry gets written from it.
First release of safety.viz — the consolidated Chart.js charting library for clinical safety graphics (safetyGraphics → gsm modernization, project P004), mirroring the gsm.kri ↔ gsm.viz architecture.
Second release of `obot.roadmap`. Where v0.1 established the hub, v0.2 closes the design phase for the portfolio's founding requirements: designs for the safety.viz library, the histogram pilot, the…
A Friday-night sit-down that ran into Saturday morning, worked across two agent sessions and a fleet of subagents — and shipped the thing the whole month has been building toward: **safety.viz v0.1.0…
A short evening session on the session workflow itself, run as a live test of the day-old kickoff skills: each invocation drew immediate feedback from @jwildfire and a same-hour fix. The kickoff list…
The documentation-site lane closes its build phase: @jwildfire merged the evidence-pipeline and API-reference PRs in the morning, and by afternoon the site build itself (#7) was up as a draft PR —…
The histogram lane ships its code — scaffold merged, module extracted — and documentation becomes the delivery bar: requirement #21 (safety.viz documentation site) was filed, designed, and signed off…
The rule that a chart is not done until it is published: a documentation site carrying a live demo, a test-evidence page and an API reference for every renderer, plus the branch model that makes the gate enforceable.
obotclaw goes live and the pipeline fills in behind it — the App registered, credentialed, and green on both acceptance paths; designs #1/#2 signed off with sub-issues filed and the safety.viz…
The case for stopping maintenance of two parallel agent harnesses and rebuilding this one as a thin project overlay on the shared base — the layering model, and the two requirements it became.
The proposal for a session that picks one or two lanes, spawns a background agent for each, tracks them and closes the day by writing the diary entry — kept as the point-in-time record of a design later absorbed into the session hub.
The hub goes live — PR #8 merged, v0.1 released, News feed added — and the obot GitHub App requirement moves into design.
How nine legacy safetyGraphics charts become one Chart.js library consumed by R widgets: the repo layout, the contract every chart module honours, the stack, and how each requirement is traced to a test.
The safety histogram as the pilot for the whole renderer-migration recipe — extracting the working chart into the shared library, then binding it as an R widget. The two slices that prove the pattern.
One GitHub App to replace the retired machine account: how agents and Actions each get a scoped, short-lived token, where the key lives, and what an agent calls to mint one.
First release of `obot.roadmap`: the development roadmap and project homepage for the obot open-source safety-graphics portfolio. This release establishes the requirement workflow and consolidates…
So, here’s the plan for {safetyGraphics} v2.1 AI collaboration note — I outlined this post in June. Claude Code (using Fable 5) expanded my outline into a draft, and I reviewed and edited the result…
obot.roadmap becomes the project's memory: hub-migration requirement, HTML design doc, and full site implementation.
The ten-chapter record of how autonomous development was attempted, why the scheduled-agent route failed, and the pivot to interactive Claude Code sessions — the report the current way of working came out of.
How the archived public hub became this repo — the directory layout, what was migrated and with what provenance, what happened to the legacy projects, and which pages are generated at deploy time rather than committed.
As part of the keynote, I want to see if AI can update and modernize {safetyGraphics}. {safetyGraphics} was the first big open-source project I worked on, so I also want to talk a bit more generally…
Thursday was a framework-hardening and publish-hygiene day: local autonomous-work instructions were tightened around Development queue freshness, public GitHub state was rechecked, and the Hub…
Wednesday was an operations and queue-hygiene day: the PR review watch found no new agent-side implementation changes to make, the Development block stopped instead of starting stale work, and P008…
Tuesday was a consolidation day: the Hub navigation was cleaned up after the Paperclip/P009 report burst, public gsm.safety planning issues received agent analysis, and the open human-decision queue…
Monday turned the autonomy work from runner proof into a guarded Paperclip production path: P009 finished its runner/action evidence, P008 completed local Paperclip PM and Dev pilots, and the…
What supervised runs changed for the operator: automation moved from “a prompt was triggered, assume it is running” to a durable record with run ids, heartbeats, transcripts and a recovery path.
Sunday shifted the autonomy roadmap from broad framework design into execution-first reliability work: the Hub reports now explain the recommendation, P009 proved a supervised Codex-native runner…
Third pass, written after scheduled agent runs kept dying before they started: the blocker was the scheduler itself, not the prompts or the portfolio framework. Superseded by the Paperclip evaluation.
Whether to buy orchestration instead of building it — cost, security, stack fit and competitor readiness for the Paperclip agent platform, ending in a bounded pilot rather than a migration. Superseded by the framework report.
Saturday focused on turning obot's autonomous workflow from ad hoc sessions into a supervised, GitHub-native operating loop, while keeping P004 and the keynote work visible and reviewable.
First pass at making agent work cycles reliable: what other systems do about run ledgers, heartbeats and issue-to-pull-request handoffs, and why the answer was the smallest custom layer rather than a platform. Superseded by v2.
Second pass: a hybrid model with the chat assistant owning intake, scheduling and liveness while a coding agent owns analysis and execution, laid out layer by layer with the evidence each one leaves. Superseded by v3.
A review that caught the project-management cycle selecting development work without auditing the portfolio first, and the audit checklist added to stop it happening again.
Why spawned agents kept returning ids that then did not exist: a mixed orchestration stack, no durable proof an agent was alive, and what has to be standardized before background agents can be relied on.
The acceptance evidence for supervised work sessions: each criterion, the artifact that satisfies it, and whether it was met — the sign-off record for that piece of the runner.
Friday was an autonomy-framework day. P007 moved from concept into a working public roadmap/autonomy loop, and the first autonomous P004 work blocks produced concrete Safety Histogram evidence…
How autonomous the development workflow actually was in June 2026, and the case for a promoted work queue, explicit authority levels and test-first migration gates instead of a setup tuned for reactive chat.
Thursday was a quiet public implementation day: the June 3 Hub briefing and Pages deployment succeeded, the Hub was safely reconciled with `origin/main` before publishing, no new public…
Wednesday kept the public queue steady: the June 2 Hub briefing and Pages deployment succeeded, no new public implementation commits landed in the tracked active repos, and the highest-leverage next…
Tuesday kept the public implementation queue steady: the June 1 Hub briefing and Pages deployment succeeded, no new public implementation commits landed in the tracked active repos, and the…
Monday was a quiet public implementation day with useful maintenance: the May 31 Hub briefing and Pages deployment succeeded, the active public PR queue stayed unchanged, and a private framework…
Sunday was a steady maintenance day: the May 30 Hub briefing and Pages deployment succeeded, no new public implementation commits landed in the tracked active repos, and the next useful work remains…
Saturday was a quiet public-project maintenance day: the May 29 Hub briefing and Pages deployment succeeded, tracked public implementation repos did not add new commits, and the active queue remains…
Friday was a quiet public-project maintenance day: the May 28 Hub briefing and Pages deployment succeeded, tracked public implementation repos did not add new commits, and the main P004 decision…
Thursday was another quiet public-project day: the May 27 Hub briefing deployed successfully, no new public implementation commits landed in the tracked project repos, and P004 remains focused on…
Wednesday was a quiet public-project day: no new public commits or PR merges landed after the May 26 briefing, the Hub deploy for that briefing completed successfully, and P004 remains queued around…
Tuesday moved P004 from broad requirement harvesting toward repeatable qualification: safety-agent PR #4 now documents reviewed renderer requirements and testing workflow, and safety-histogram PR #2…
Monday was a quiet public-project maintenance day: the May 24 Hub deploy completed successfully, public PR and issue queues stayed unchanged, and local workflow guardrails were tightened for future…
Sunday added P006 for Jeremy's R/Pharma 2026 AI keynote deck, published the first deck scaffold and project links, and kept P004/gsm.safety public queues stable while nightly reporting refreshed…
Quiet Saturday maintenance: the May 22 reporting deploy completed successfully, public PR and issue status stayed stable, and P004 remains focused on validating the Safety Histogram migration pattern…
Quiet Friday maintenance: the May 21 reporting deploy completed successfully, no public PRs or issues changed during the workday, and the active priority remains converting the Safety Histogram spike…
Quiet Thursday follow-through: the May 20 P004 reporting deploy completed successfully, active public PR and issue status stayed stable, and the next priority remains turning the Safety Histogram…
P004 moved from planning into active renderer modernization: staging forks, safety-agent coordination, interview decisions, deployed renderer demos, and the first requirements-driven Safety Histogram…
Quiet Tuesday maintenance: May 18 reporting deployed cleanly, public project status was rechecked, and active follow-ups stayed focused on the gsm.safety thumbnail draft and upcoming…
Quiet Monday maintenance: May 17 reporting deployed cleanly, Telegram briefing output was tightened, and public project priorities stayed stable.
Quiet Sunday maintenance: briefing automation published cleanly, public project state was checked, and priorities remain stable.
Quiet maintenance day: reporting cadence held, public project state reviewed, and next priorities stayed stable.
First gsm.safety release, widget workflow wrap-up, homepage metrics, and next-project planning.
First release of `gsm.safety`, focused on workflow-driven SafetyCharts HTML widget reports for Good Statistical Monitoring workflows.
SafetyCharts widget debugging, PR #26 iteration, and initial reporting hub setup.
AE Explorer workflow was stabilized and merged; safetyCharts expansion started.
Requirements and implementation planning for the first gsm.safety report workflow.
A response to Mike Brock’s “The Capital is Misaligned and the Crash is Coming” drafted by Opus 4.7 based on a text thread with my friend who sent the article and edited by me.